Palestinian 'privilege' (the full series)

 

 

'Dual Loyalties'

"Anti fascists" in the UK

Why Corbyn’s Labour Party antisemitism is a net vote winner

Exposing the antisemitism of Corbyn's Labour Party is the right thing to do, but will make no difference (and may even win Corbyn more votes).

May's government finds even more money to fund the murder of Jews

And people still think Theresa May is a 'friend of Israel'...

And here's more from the idiotic Alistair Burt (all today) - very keen to give taxpayer money to every corrupt Arab regime (and note the Lebanese LAF is now under the control of Hezbollah) while getting his advice about Israel from the anti-Zionist goons of Yachad:

See also:

Next time CST or Board of Deputies tell you who are our enemies remember this weekend

While Britain's 'official leadership' in the CST, Board of Deputies, JLC,  etc. continue to work with leftist and Islamist 'anti-racist' organisations who seek to destroy Israel and close down free speech, Tommy Robinson continues to risk his life to support free speech, highlight the dangers that Islam poses to all in the UK (especially Jews) and supports Israel. And Britain's 'official leadership' continues to warn that it is Tommy Robinson who is our enemy. Don't accept their lies any longer.

 And the same goes for the Jewish Chronicle and Jewish News. Hypocrites and liars all of them.

Why is this terrorist attack being covered up and ignored?

Update 25 Feb 2018. Since posting this story a third victim, Shilo Siman Tov (aged 23) had died from his injuries. The Arab who drove the lorry crushing the soldiers is still under detention. He had 115 previous driving offences and nobody seems to be asking why he was still allowed to drive a heavy lorry on Israeli roads, let alone how he came to drive it in such a way as to completely demolish three stationary army vehicles.

Shilo Siman Tov: 3rd victim of Arab truck attack

Tonight's Channel 10 News in Israel spent no less than the first 40 minutes on the Netanyahu 'story' before briefly mentioning this tragedy as if it was an everyday occurence...

Warsi at it again

See also Warsi.

Yachad perpetuates another blood libel against Israel

Even ignoring the choice of guest speaker at an annual gala for an organisation that still laughingly claims it is 'pro-Israel' this is really appalling....

Update: When I commented about this on the Yachad Facebook advert for the event look what response I got:

And look at the response from one of their goons to another person's comment (this was not me who commented):

See more on Yachad

Everything wrong with CST can be seen by looking at their website blog

This is a natural follow-on from my recent postings about the pathetic ineptitude of Britain's 'official Jews' in combating antisemites (almost all of which is now antisemitism disguised as 'anti-Zionism').

See also:

• More on a typical British debate on Israel
• How not to respond to antisemites
• CST: part of the problem rather than the solution 
• Britain's 'official Jews' go full dhimmi mode. 

More on a typical British debate on Israel

Following on from my post yesterday, here is a further simple summary. There's really no need to ever listen to, or watch, a 'debate about Israel/Palestine' as it always follows this pathetic route. The 'trembling Israelite' response and what it should be.

See also: How not to respond to antisemites

How NOT to respond to antisemites claiming 'only to be against Israeli government'

Every day in the main stream media we hear antisemites 'people opposed to the Israeli government'  spew hatred and lies against Israel and say "it is not antisemitic to point these things out". 

In Britain - if any response at all is offered - it is usually in the form of an apologetic 'Jewish spokesperson' who, instead of challenging the lies about Israel, says meekly: "It is antisemitic to blame British Jews for the actions of the Israeli government".  

This short video explains what the response should be. Update: see more on this here.

Israel: reality and perception

See also: The "Shrinking Palestine" maps lie

Spot the most dangerous antisemite here....

What leftists believe (on boycotts)

So Israel considers barring entry to those people who campaign to stop people going to Israel, i.e. Israel has decided to boycott the boycotters. And the boycotters are now furious that they cannot enter Israel....

See:

• Leftist logic on Iran
• More leftist logic

'Palestinian' Privelege Rule 138: Antisemitism

The BBC are especially complicit in this

See, for example:BBC defends translation of ‘Jews’ as ‘Israel’ in Gaza doc

See the full Palestine privilege series 

Why the media and leftists are silent on the Iranian uprising

It doesn't fit their narrative

See: Why Can’t the American Media Cover the Protests in Iran?

See: More leftist logic

'Palestinian' privilege rule 371: Being a 'peace activist'

For full details of the Tamimi family see: This Ongoing War.

WATCH: Shirley Temper & Friends Violently Attacking Patient & Poised Soldiers

The deceptive campaign for Ahed Tamimi

See the full Palestine privilege series (many are relevant to the Tamimis)

Leftists’ definition of what is and isn’t antisemitism

This actually applies not just to leftists but to most of the main stream media, including especially Jewish newspapers such as the Jerusalem Post and Jewish Chronicle which have been at the forefront of pushing the "Criticising Soros is antisemitic" nonsense (while insisting that people like Corbyn are not antisemites)..

Soros funding of anti-Israel groups

'Palestinian" ingenuity

Updated May 2018 to include the killer kites of Gaza.
Let nobody accuse the 'Palestinians' of lacking ingenuity. They have given so much to the world...

 And this doesn't include other novel acts committed before they called themselves 'Palestinians' like massacring nurses and doctors (13 April 1948, 78 killed in Hadassah hospital convoy) as well as being 14 years ahead of the Nazis in ethnic cleansing Jews from an entire town when they murdered/expelled the entire Jewish community from Hebron in 1928.
...their only regret is that it was other Islamic terrorists who came up with such wonderful inventions as the shoe bomb and the underwear bomb.

Alternative spin on this

That mental illness problem again.....

So a radical Islamist drives a truck into a bunch of Christmas shoppers in Melbourne saying "it was because of what is being done to Muslims", yet the authorities immediately rule out terrorism and blame mental health, and the media duly censor out the Islamist terrorism angle from the story (see example below).  Again. Good thing today's main stream media weren't reporting in 1939.

Here is how the supposedly most conservative British newspaper (the Express) reported it today:

I guess they are simply following the script:

The Palestinian 'pay-to-slay' budget continues

In the UK the Daily Express has been running a vigorous campaign exposing the lunacy of the country's £13billion annual overseas aid budget. Every day they publicise a new example of some inappropriate spending. Yet, by far and away the worse example of all - the 'Palestinian' pay-to-slay budget - is never mentioned. This should be an open goal for the Board of Deputies. The British public is sick of the overseas aid budget. If the Board - instead of spending its money fighting 'Islamophobia' - paid for a few ads to expose the pay-to-slay scandal - the Government would come under real pressure to stop these payments once and for all. And that would be a real contribution to the fight against terrorism.

It's started again

After the Palestinians of Gaza fired rockets into Israel today (one hitting the town of Sderot and one intercepted by the Iron Dome) this was the headline in the Independent:

See: media bias

If the response to Pearl Harbour had been the same as that to modern Islamic attacks

Updated 7 Dec 2017

On the anniversary of the Pearl Harbour Attack it is worth considering what would have happened if the response would have been the same as that of the response to the 9/11 (and other) Islamist attacks against the West:

• The main stream media would have insisted there was no evidence that the attacking airplanes were Japanese.
• The main stream media would also have claimed each pilot was acting completely independently, and likely had 'mental issues'.
• The US would have declared a 'war against fighter aircraft' with a clear statement that 'this in no way linked to the great nation of Japan which, like Nazi Germany, is a nation of peace'. 
• This might  have been followed by a few sorties against Japanese fighter aircraft; but, as a token to prove there was no bias against the Japanese people, some British spitfires would also have been attacked. 
• To ensure that America did not attack mainland Japan, leftists from all over the world would have gone to Tokyo to form human shields.
• There would have been years of appeasement of Japan and Germany, plus massive funding of 'moderate' Imperial Japanese and Nazi institutions. 
• The media would have devoted most of its time on identifying what the US had done to invite the attacks, such as not forcing Britain to leave Singapore to allow the Japanese to invade.
• (Like Israel today) Singapore and Britain would have become the focus of hatred for provoking the Japanese and Nazis by daring to protect their right to exist. The Americans and all the world's free nations would have demanded major and painful concessions from Singapore and Britain to ensure peace with the Japanese and Nazis.
• There would have been widespread theories that it was all a Jewish/Zionist plot to force America into the war (oh actually that really did happen anyway) and that all Jewish personnel in Hawaii had left the evening before the attack.
• There would have been a string of documentaries made about how it was physically impossible for the attack to have happened and, in particular, for a ship like the SS Arizona to be destroyed by Japanese aircraft. These documentaries would have been split evenly between those that claim the attack never actually happened and those claiming the Americans and Zionists had planted bombs to explode the ship.
• By 1945 America would have been a Japanese colony, and to this day Europe would still be under Nazi rule.

Conversely, if the response to 9/11 had been similar to the actual response to Pearl Harbour then:

• The US would have declared war on all Islamic fundamentalists and would not have stopped until Islam was totally eradicated throughout the world as a supremacist belief. 
• The first targets would have been Saudi Arabia and Iran. 
• All Muslims in the USA would have been imprisoned and/or kept under surveillance.
• The war would only have finished with a prolonged programme of 'de-Islamification' (the de-Nazification  programme for Germany took many years to work even though the people had only been indoctrinated for 10 years. Islamists have been indoctrinating Muslims for 1300 years).

See also:

• If the BBC reported 9/11 attacks like it reported attacks on Israel
• If the response to 9/11 had been the same as the response to Pearl Harbour
• Rules and guidelines for reporting about Israel and the Middle East
• (Daniel Greenfield) A day that will live forever in infamy

If Theresa May was really interested in fighting Islamist terrorism ......

Today Theresa May is in Jordan discussing strategies to combat terrorism. Instead of trying to stop people (including Donald Trump) from highlighting Islamic threats online, she could ask the King of Jordan to comply with their extradition treaty with the USA.......

Ahlam Tamimi is the female Hamas terrorist who planned and engineered the 2001 massacre of 16 people, including 8 children, in Jerusalem’s Sbarro restaurant. One of her victims was 15-year-old Malki Roth (an American citizen) and her parents maintain an incredible blog about the case here. 

As a mass murderer of Jewish kids she was the most 'honoured' of all the terrorists released in the ludicrous exchange for Gilad Shalit. She became a major celebrity in the Arab world, presenting a weekly TV programme where she encouraged millions of viewers to emulate her crimes. By inciting terrorism Tamimi was subject to re-arrest under the terms of the release, but by living in Jordan the Israelis were unable to re-arrest her. However, because two of her victims were American citizens the FBI has recently put Tamimi on their most wanted terrorist list and requested her extradition from Jordan. The Jordanians, who also recently honoured child murderer Ahmad Dakamseh, have refused.

Here is Tamimi smiling when she is told in prison for the first time how many children she killed:

Here is Tamimi boasting of her crimes after her release.

The names of those murdered by Tamimi:

• Zvika Golombek, 26, from Karmiel
• Shoshana Yehudit (Judy) Greenbaum, 31 (5 months pregnant), from Passaic, New Jersey, U.S.
• Tehila Maoz, 18, from Jerusalem
• Frieda Mendelsohn, 62, from Jerusalem
• Michal Raziel, 16, from Jerusalem
• Malka Chana (Malki) Roth, 15, from Jerusalem
• Mordechai Schijveschuurder, 43, from Neria
• Tzira Schijveschuurder, 41, from Neria
• Ra'aya Schijveschuurder, 14, from Neria
• Avraham Yitzhak Schijveschuurder, 4, from Neria
• Hemda Schijveschuurder, 2, from Neria
• Lily Shimashvili, 33, from Jerusalem
• Tamara Shimashvili, 8, from Jerusalem
• Yocheved Shoshan, 10
• Giora Balash, 60

Additionally, 130 were injured. One Chana Nachenberg (a US citizen) remains hospitalized, in a permanent vegetative state.

See also:

• Sbarro Massacre
• Trump: You must personally demand extradition of child murderer Ahlam Tamimi from Jordan 
• Jordan: hypocrites on terrorism 
• Al Jazeera paints Tamimi as victim 

Jihadist kills off-duty soldier in town centre: compare and contrast

The news of Ron's murder did not even make it as the main story in the Jerusalem Post (their report is here).

See also:

Jihadist murder of soldier: spot the difference