Friday, March 06, 2015

Update on the tax-payer funded antisemitic hatefest at Southampton University

See 10 March 2015 update here.

The University of Southampton is funding a three-day event in April devoted to searching for ways to use international law to deny the world’s only Jewish state the right to exist (the ZF has a petition about it). A friend of mine has written to the Vice Chancellor of the University (see correspondence below, which is very interesting). The latest update is that the programme for the event is now available and it is even worse than anybody could have imagined. There are 58 speakers and, contrary to what Southampton University said in response to my friend, every single one appears to be an anti-Israel activist (see the excellent Open Letter to University of Southampton).

1. Email sent 20 Feb 2015
Dear Professor Don Nutbeam

Can you please explain why the University of Southampton is funding a three-day event in April devoted to searching for ways to use international law to deny the world’s only Jewish state the right to exist? I am referring to this:

Are you aware that the member of your academic staff behind this event (Prof Oren Ben-Dor) actively supports well-known anti-Semites such as Gilad Atzmon and is in turn supported by former Klu Klux Klan leader David Duke who has praised Ben-Dor as “perhaps the bravest and clearest thinking person of Jewish descent in the world.”

You must surely be aware that the recent massive increase in anti-Semitism is being fuelled in part by lies and propaganda directed against the tiny Jewish State. I find it incomprehensible that, in such a climate, your University is actually funding such anti-Semitism under the ludicrous guise of academic debate.


2. Response 24 Feb 2015


Thank you for your email dated 20 February to the Vice-Chancellor concerning the conference on International Law and the State of Israel. Professor Nutbeam has asked me to reply on his behalf.

The University of Southampton is legally obliged under Section 43 of the Education (No 2) Act 1986, to take such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure that freedom of speech within the law is secured for members, students and employees of the University as well as for visiting speakers.

Our ordinances state that academic staff “have freedom within the law to question and test received wisdom, and to put forward new ideas and controversial or unpopular opinions, with due regard for the need to respect others and promote the best interests of the University and academic learning, without placing themselves in jeopardy of losing their jobs or privileges.”

The title of this conference raises an important question, but the conference itself takes no explicit perspective, and academic contributions from all interested parties are most welcome. The conference is designed to have a multi-cultural emphasis, and speakers and delegates have been invited from all perspectives. Their participation has been actively encouraged in relation to the presentation of individual papers and the running of dedicated panel sessions.

Details about the conference can be found at:

Separately from the conference, this University is very proud to host the Parkes Institute, the world's oldest and most wide-ranging centre for the study of Jewish/non-Jewish relations across the ages. The Institute was founded by James Parkes, a tireless fighter against anti-Semitism, who transferred his extensive library and archive to the university in 1964. The Parkes Institute carries out a range of activities. As well as teaching at both undergraduate and postgraduate level, and an extensive research programme, the Institute has a rapidly developing outreach programme which includes adult education classes and cultural days, schools and colleges visits, as well as public seminars and lectures.

Our academic staff from Parkes - and across the university - have a range of education and research collaborations with colleagues in Israel.

Yours sincerely

Gavin Costigan

Gavin Costigan
Director of the Office of the Vice-Chancellor
University of Southampton
Room 4035, Building 37, Highfield Campus
Southampton SO17 1BJ

3. Second email sent 25 Feb 2015 

Dear Gavin

Thank you for your response.

Unfortunately, there is a fundamental and demonstrably obvious error in your response. You said
“The title of this conference raises an important question, but the conference itself takes no explicit perspective, and academic contributions from all interested parties are most welcome.”

The conference website very clearly contradicts this.
Whereas the title is ambiguous, the theme is not since in the opening paragraph it says
“(The conference) is unique because it concerns the legitimacy in International Law of the Jewish state of Israel.”
It then says
“The conference aims to explore the relatedness of the suffering and injustice in Palestine to the foundation and protection of a state of such nature and asks what role International Law should play in the situation.”

To suggest, as you do, that this takes “no explicit perspective” is an insult to my intelligence, since the perspective is very clearly one that rejects the legitimacy of the Jewish State – a view very forcibly and openly known to be held by BOTH of the listed academic organisers of the conference, as well as all the other academics on the Southampton Organizing committee. As the conference website STILL does not list any of the speakers how can you possibly know that “academic contributions from all interested parties are most welcome.”? Perhaps you can let me know of speakers who will be presenting the unequivocal case for Israel.

There are other aspects of your response that I find deeply insulting. By stressing your commitment to freedom of speech and academic freedom to raise controversial issues, you are clearly implying that I am somehow against these principles. In fact, I was asking why Southampton University was providing FUNDING support for an event that is clearly an anti-semitic hatefest of lies and propaganda under the cover of simply being just ‘anti-Zionist’. I recognise that  these people are perfectly entitled to hold their views and even run events using their own funding, but not that of a tax-payer funded institution. I would also like to point out that I suspect your University would not, for example, support an event that challenged the legitimacy of any one of the 58 Islamic States (including, for example, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan which was only recognised by the UN in the same year as Israel). 

I was also insulted by your reference to the Parkes Institute – this actually reminded me of the classic “Some of my best friends are Jewish” response to complaints of anti-Semitic behaviour. What on earth is the relevance of the fact that Southampton has a research centre on “Jewish/non-Jewish relations” got to do with my complaint. The Parkes Centre clearly has no input or relationship to this conference, and I was not accusing the University of institutional anti-semitism. I was asking why it was funding a demonstrably political anti-semitic event under the ludicrous guise of academic debate. And you have not answered that question.

I would, of course, welcome Professor Nutbeam’s comments on the above points.
I would also like to know how much funding support (including the time of support staff) that  the University is providing for the conference.

Yours sincerely


4. Follow-up sent 2 March 2015

Dear Gavin

I was wondering if you or the V-C were going to respond to the attached follow-up letter I sent on 25 Feb.
If not I will be taking the matter up with the University Council.

Perhaps I need to stress that Professor Ben Dor’s fundraising letter asking to support the conference notes explicitly that the “conference is fully hosted, and supported by the University of Southampton. The university enables us to use its hospitality services, event organisation, marketing network and financial administration for the organisation, delivery, recording of the conference. It is a remarkable achievement in itself that such a conference will be help [sic] in UK academia.”

What I am asking for is the real cost of the above-stated University services.


5. Response 2 March 2015


Thank you for your email, and I do apologise in the delay in responding. We have received a number of queries about this conference and we are currently preparing answers to questions that you and others have raised.

I hope to be able to respond by the end of this week.

With best wishes

Gavin Costigan

6. Followup email 5 March 2015


While I await your response, I think it is important to know that I have learnt that one of the speakers is going to be Richard Falk, a former UN advisor whose career has been marked by outrageous claims and statements. These include:
  • Publishing an anti-Semitic cartoon, for which he was condemned by the US.
  • Promoting 9/11 conspiracy theories, for which he was condemned by Ban Ki-Moon
  • Describing Israel as 'genocidal,' for which he was condemned by Canada.
  • Blaming the Boston Marathon bombings on American foreign policy, specifically her relationship with Israel. This was not only condemned by the US and Ban Ki-Moon, but the British Foreign Office specifically described his comments as being anti-Semitic.


7. Response 6 March 2015

I am writing to let you know that I will not now be able to provide a full response to your email until Monday or Tuesday next week, for which apologies. However, you asked about speakers and I wanted to let you know that the conference programme is now on the website and can be found here:

I will respond more fully next week.

With best wishes

See 10 March 2015 update here.



Dave said...

Edgar, did a piece on the conference too....also listed the panellists an what there positions are on the issue. 80% support the boycott.

Confronting antisemitism and Israel hatred said...

Excellent. I have updated the article to include a link. Although only 80% openly support the boycott of Israel, I think it is fair to say that 100% are anti-Israel.

Dave said...

I have no doubt you are right, I think in the list I came across 2, maybe 3 out of the 50, who were not publicly vehemently anti -Israel to the point of being activists (doesn't mean they aren't anti). I also think that some of the 20% 'non boycotters' may be restricted either through their nations laws or their organization's rules about signing up for boycotts anyway. It's just when I put the list together, I had to make it accurate so made no assumptions and provided sources for any claims. Thx for the link. Keep up the good work.

Joel Shapiro said...

They say they are "The legally to ensure that freedom of speech..." Ask them if they will host an anti-Saudi or Arab Peninsula BDS conference. Either they are for free speech or they aren't. My guess is that they believe in free speech when it comes to undermining Israel, but are completely against free speech when it comes to criticizing misogyny, racism, homophobia, discrimination, slavery, fascism, or whatever, in the Muslim world.

Joel Shapiro said...

I just sent this letter to the University. Wonder if i will ever hear back. Puts them in a nasty position -- maybe a great way to expose their hypocrisy.

Dear Costigan and Nutbeam,

Since “the University of Southampton is legally obliged under Section 43 of the Education (No 2) Act 1986, to…ensure…freedom of speech…” (your words), would you please support our conference on your campus calling for boycott, divestment, and sanctions against all major Palestinians political parties and all of the Arab countries that continue their war against Israel.

I hope that your commitment to free speech extends beyond the racist demonization of Israel (based almost exclusively on false claims) to legitimate and non-racist critique of the Arab war against Israel, Arab crimes against humanity, Palestinian war crimes, and the like.

This could be an ideal venue to show that you are really impartial and truly committed to peace, and not simply leaders in this new generation of Jew-hating neo Nazis.

We will show in our conference how the Palestinian movement is a neo-Nazi ideology – this is not a metaphor or an insult but a fact that we will establish beyond doubt – and that it is also bad for peace and bad for the Palestinians. Supporting the fake Palestinian movement holds the Palestinian people back from getting their own state, making peace with their neighbour, and building a moral and economically sustainable nation.

I personally believe that most western intellectuals support the Palestinian movement not because they are evil or Jew haters but simply because they have only been exposed to Palestinian propaganda, and simply do not know better. This is a perfect opportunity for peaceful, non-racist enlightenment of your students and faculty who have accidentally been led astray by a racist and genocidal movement.

Who should I talk to at your University with respect to planning our conference?

I am very excited about this opportunity and so looking forward to bringing peace and a respect for true human rights to your campus.

Thank you for your kind attention.

Joel Shapiro, Ph.D.

Confronting antisemitism and Israel hatred said...


Excellent! In one of my many run-ins with the LSE I asked a similar question of the the VC:

Unknown said...

it would be very important Update on the tax-payer funded antisemitic hatefest at Southampton University post. thanks for bring this kind of useful forum.

Umbrella company IR35 solution for nurses in UK | hire uk tax advisers

Unknown said...

there have their cash and the government will be levying extra tax from their misery. further Update on the tax-payer funded antisemitic hatefest at Southampton University.

Professional Tax adviser in the UK

Professional Tax specialist in the UK

Outbooks Australia said...

Accounts Payable (AP) is one of the most challenging tasks for businesses to perform in today's competitive environment.