Harry Markham, the dynamic and brilliant young National Director of Herut UK and self-declared 'unapologetic Zionist' has offered several times to speak to Bristol University’s Jewish Society (one of the country’s biggest). They have never even responded to his
requests and it appears they have a policy of disassociating themselves with Israel.
 |
| https://www.facebook.com/100002208381787/posts/2437338879683034 |
Sabrina is an active Jewish student at Bristol who has been
“elected as an NUS delegate to represent the entire Bristol student body”. Despite the article title (“Being a Zionist on Campus”) and
the promising beginning in which she says that campus Israel hatred
she feared never materialized, it is clear that, whatever her thoughts about Israel before
entering the University, her thoughts must have changed since she got there as
she says:
After being forced to digest some really uncomfortable truths
about Israel I am so grateful that I've been able to discuss the conflict with
many people who don't preach that the IDF “is the most moral army in the world”
or that “Israeli settlements aren’t a barrier to peace”
I invite people to read the
comments on the article. For
those who cannot access FaceBook, I reproduce the most relevant parts of the discussion between Sabrina and Harry Markham below. It is depressing to know
that Sabrina, rather than Harry, may represent the future of British Jews (I have highlighted some of Sabrina's text).
Harry Markham: What are the "uncomfortable truths
about Israel" you are talking about? Why are Israelis living in Judea and
Samaria an obstacle to peace? If it was such an obstacle, why wasn't there
peace from 1949 till 1967 when Jordanian Islamism made that region Judenrein?!
This kind of appeasement doesn't work, Sabrina.
You write beautifully, but you now believe these false
narratives.
Jews not in the Bristol Jsoc exec should be thoroughly
outraged by your Jsoc and its sheer cowardice.
Sabrina Miller: Firstly, why do you keep attacking the JSOC
committee because we don't agree with you on Israel. JSOC is so much more than
Israel, we do so much for the jewish community here and calling us cowards
because we're not right wing is neither true or helpful. Secondly we were all
democratically voted in so whether or not you like it, Jews at Bristol support
us and this committee.. So onto your first question of 'uncomfortable
truths'. Uncomfortable truths include the racism that exists and pervades
Israeli society. Those truths include listening to the impact that occupation
has on the lives of Palestinians. Uncomfortable truths is learning about the
terror attacks committed by Jewish settlers to name a few. Truths like 750 000
Palestinains were displaced during the independence war and many of them still
live in refugee camps in Lebanon, Gaza, WB + other places * I believe in a 2
state solution. Like jews have a right to self determination so do
Palestinians. Thus in my opinion settlements prevent the establishment of a
future autonomous Palestinian state - hope that answers your questions xx
Harry Markham: 1. Your Jsoc and its refusal to do Israel/Zionist activity
only contributes to antisemitism in Bristol. It is quite extraordinary that the
voice of Jewish students at Bristol rather than taking a lead in the fight
against antisemitism, it has become part of the problem.
2. I wholeheartedly agree that Jsoc should be more than
Israel. But your Jsoc represents different parts of Jewish identity - and
Zionism is part of it. I can think of no other reason than cowardice for your
Jsoc not doing Zionist activity. And if those in your Jsoc don't like it, then
just like how some don't like the religious part, they don't need to come to
those events. But don't make Zionist students feel they have no representation.
3. Why is racism in Israel an uncomfortable truth? Like me,
you strive to normalise Zionism and Israel, so why shouldn't Israel have
societal issues like racism? Every nation in the world suffers from this
cancer, Israel is no different. We have our problems, which country in the
world doesn't have problems?
4. How can Israel occupy something which under international
law belongs to them? The Mandate for Palestine 1922, later reaffirmed by
Article 80 of UN law, means an Israeli presence is legal. Which law makes our
presence illegal? Which law states our presence is that of
"occupation"?
5. Which terror attacks?
6. Firstly, 750,000 is an overly inflated figure. The real
number is around 550,000 - 600,000.
And let's look at this idea of "displacement" -
In 1937 and in 1947, a two state solution was proposed. The
Arabs rejected this, Israel agreed to it. Arab leaders such as Azzam Pashra
said on the day of Israeli independence, where Israel stated its commitment to
live with all people in harmony, "This will be a war of extermination and
to a momentous massacre which will be remembered like the Mongolian Massacres
and the Crusades." Inspite of Israel's efforts at peace, Islamic
intolerance meant this is what Israel was up against. And Israel had a duty to
defend itself. There was no surgical effort to remove Arabs residing in Israel.
This was a lie that arose from the myth of Deir Yassin "Massacre",
which was used as a tool of fear by the Arab leaders to get the Arab population
out of Israel, and return when Israel is destroyed. Just look at Haifa, in 1947
it had the second largest Arab population in the land. The Hagannah insisted
the Arab population will stay, they even broke the festival of Passover in
order to bake bread for the local Arab inhabitants. Sir Alan Cunningham, the
British Commissionor of Palestine said, "British authorities in Haifa have
formed the impression that totllal evacuation is being urged on the Haifa Arab
quarters and that the townsfolk themselves are against it." The local
British Police Commander noted in a letter "Every effort is being made by
the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal
lives."
And yes, they are living in nasty refugee camps. Israel has
offered opportunities at resolving this such as the Lausanne proposal, however
everytime the Arab leaders reject these proposals. Why?
Yassar Arafat's side, Sakhwe Abesh said, "To us, the
refugee issue is the winning card toneuich means the end of the Israeli
state." Or even Lt Geb Galloway, former director of UNRWA said, "It
is perfectly clear that Arab nations do not want to solve the Arab refugee
problem. They want to keep it ae an open score, as an affront against the UN
and as a weapon against Israel. Arab leaders don't give a damm whether refugees
live or die."
The real injustice is your failure to speak about what
happened in Hebron 1929 (67 Jews massacred), Arab Riots 1936 -1939 (over 400
Jews massacred). These are just two of many anti Jewish massacres in pre state
Israel. These were real injustices - what you have given me is unsubstantiated
and this historical revisionism has become the new Blood Libel.
You have the privilege of living in the diaspora. You are
not living in Sderot facing regular rocket attacks. If you want to change
Israel, move there. Don't be part of the problem and put Jews on the backfoot
here in the UK by endorsing antisemitic narratives. Debunk them. Israelis don't
want your North West London diaspora privilege, they want your support.
The ball is in your court...
See also:
