What is especially interesting about this is that the Charity clearly has some qualms about its Palestine 'valuation' because, unlike any other country listed, it breaks 'Palestine' into three 'sub countries', namely Palestine (Hebron), Palestine (Jersusalem), and Palestine (Gaza). Despite this the three Palestines still manage to comfortably get 1st, 2nd and 4th places in the value table. And quite why the Palestinians of Jerusalem are in there at all is especially puzzling. There are only 140,000 of them yet they are valued at a whopping £285. Although the average per capita income of a Jerusalem Muslim is about 30 times that of a Pakistani, the 174 million Pakistani Muslims are only valued at £55. Taking account of population size and per capita income that means a Palestinian in Jerusalem is valued nearly two hundred thousand times more than a Pakistani Muslim.
And to think that so many anti-Israel critics in the UK damned the 1000 to 1 Schalit deal as 'proof' that Israel valued Jewish lives so much more than Muslims.
I wonder why the Muslim world values Palestinian Muslims so far above all others?
i did think this when watching some of the islam channels over eid in the uk. a great counter argument and great spot. a very good post!!
ReplyDeletejewhicans
woould love it if somebody could go on galloway's goebbels talksport show and make that exact point. to listen to him weasel out of it be verry interesting indeed.
ReplyDeletejewhicans
Thank you present an interesting and useful information.
ReplyDeleteCara Melancarakan BAB